Confused

image

They’ve been doing it for fifty years. Remember, LBJ said if they passed welfare blacks (except he said “niggers”) would be voting Dimocrat for the next 200 years. Only 150 years more to go.

Dimocrats love poor people. That’s why they keep one of their major voting blocs uneducated and dependent upon the gummint. Ignorant and poor people are much easier to control. Fortunately for the Dimocrats they have the useful idiots in the Congressional Black Caucus to help them and RWPPs like Jesse Hymietown Jackson and Al Tawana Brawley Crown Heights Riots Freddie’s Fashion Mart Arson Sharpton to keep dem black folks all riled up at dem eeeevil racist Republicans.

Yannow, I’ll bet Sharpton laughs his ass off at the stupid liberals on MSDNC who actually take him seriously and don’t treat him like the racist buffoon that he really is. I remember right before one of the presidential debates, Rachel Madcow asked Sharpton that since he had been in one of the Dimocrat debates in 2008 what was going through the minds of Romney and Oboner. I know what was going through Sharpton’s mind before those debates. How much longer he could keep the campaign money flowing in so he could keep flying first class and staying in deluxe hotel rooms. He has really pulled off one of the most successful scams over the last 30 years.

SOURCE: Grouchy Old Cripple

Dead Broke!

image

Yeah, Thunder Rodent Thighs and BJ were dead broke when they left the White House. They were so broke they were only able to buy two mansions. I don’t think anything that ever comes out of her mouth is the truth. She lies more than my ex-wife and that’s saying a lot.

GREAT QUESTION

I’ve asked this question many times over the past six years.

image

If you voted for Obungler in 2008 to prove you weren’t racist you must have voted for him in 2012 to prove you were stupid. How’s that Hope and Change shit working out for ya? Just wait until after the midterm elections when the employer mandate part of Obummercare kicks in.

SOURCE: Grouchy Old Cripple

Supreme Court Of The United States Rules 5-4 Against Public Unions in Harris vs. Quinn Decision

SCOTUS Rules 5-4 Against Public Unions in Harris vs. Quinn Decision

Posted by Jim Hoft with The Gateway Pundit on Monday, June 30, 2014

Public service Unions Demand Dues From Disabled People And Their Caregiver Family Members

It’s the #Progressive Way.
Pam Harris was forced to pay union dues and join a union because she took care of her disabled son in her home.

BREAKING: HOBBY LOBBY WINS!… 5-4 SCOTUS Decision – “Can’t Force Employers to Cover Contraception”

BREAKING: HOBBY LOBBY WINS!… 5-4 SCOTUS Decision – Can’t Force Employers to Cover Contraception

Posted by Jim Hoft with The Gateway Pundit on Monday, June 30, 2014

HOBBY LOBBY WINS!
Supreme Court rules 5-4 in favor of religious liberty.

When you go into business in America you do not give up your freedom of conscience.

A great day for Religious Freedom—
Obama administration overreached again!
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of Hobby Lobby today.
Progressives hammered by ruling.
The AP reported:

The Supreme Court says corporations can hold religious objections that allow them to opt out of the new health law requirement that they cover contraceptives for women.

The justices’ 5-4 decision Monday is the first time that the high court has ruled that profit-seeking businesses can hold religious views under federal law. And it means the Obama administration must search for a different way of providing free contraception to women who are covered under objecting companies’ health insurance plans.

Contraception is among a range of preventive services that must be provided at no extra charge under the health care law that President Barack Obama signed in 2010 and the Supreme Court upheld two years later.

Two years ago, Chief Justice John Roberts cast the pivotal vote that saved the health care law in the midst of Obama’s campaign for re-election.

The Supreme Court decision in here.

Of course, the far left reacted with predictable obscenity and threats.

Military Bans Bibles But Forces Soldiers to Adhere to Ramadan Rules

It’s an OBAMA world!

image

The US Air Force kicked Christian Gideon’s volunteers off base in March.

The Bibles were too offensive and violated the separation of church and state rule..

But US military personnel are expected to adhere Islamic practices during Ramadan.
Stars and Stripes reported:

U.S. personnel accustomed to drinking their coffee on the drive to work will have to put that habit on hold for about a month. It’s one of a few lifestyle changes Americans will have to make during the holy month of Ramadan.

Ramadan is the ninth month of the Islamic calendar. Officials expect Ramadan to begin at sunrise on Saturday, depending on when the new moon is sighted. The holy month lasts for approximately 30 days — until about July 28. For Muslims around the world, Ramadan is a month of fasting and devotion to God. Most Muslims fast from dawn to sunset, when families gather for Iftar — the meal that breaks the fast.

For the 8,200 U.S. personnel living here, and those serving throughout the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility — including servicemembers, civilian personnel, contractors and family members — the month may require changing some daily routines.

Businesses and government offices will reduce hours and most restaurants will be closed during daylight hours.

While not required to fast during Ramadan, in Bahrain, Americans can be fined or detained by local authorities for eating, drinking or smoking in public when off-base during daylight hours.

Navy officials are requiring U.S. personnel to dress more conservatively off-base during Ramadan. Although not a requirement by Bahraini authorities, the Navy is demanding that men wear long-sleeved shirts and women wear sleeved blouses that cover their elbows. Also, men must wear long trousers, and women should wear pants or skirts that cover the knees.

SOURCE: The Gateway Pundit

BREAKING NEWS: THE SUPREME COURT RULES AGAINST OBAMA!

BREAKING NEWS: THE SUPREME COURT RULES AGAINST OBAMA AND FOR “HOBBY LOBBY”

image

that closely-held for-profit businesses can cite religious objections to be exempted from an ObamaCare requirement to provide their workers with free contraceptive coverage, a victory for Hobby Lobby, which brought the case. The court also ruled that public sector unions cannot collect fees from home health care workers who don’t want to be part of a union — a rebuke of the Service Employee International Union, which automatically deducts dues from employees’ paychecks.

Supreme Court backs Hobby Lobby in contraceptive mandate challenge

Justice Samuel Alito wrote the majority opinion in the ObamaCare case. The court’s four liberal justices dissented.

The court stressed that its ruling applies only to corporations that are under the control of just a few people in which there is no essential difference between the business and its owners.

Alito also said the decision is limited to contraceptives under the health care law. “Our decision should not be understood to hold that an insurance-coverage mandate must necessarily fall if it conflicts with an employer’s religious beliefs,” Alito said.

At issue in the ObamaCare case was a challenge brought by Oklahoma City-based Hobby Lobby and a furniture maker in Pennsylvania. The for-profit businesses challenged the requirement in the Affordable Care Act that employers cover contraception for women at no extra charge among a range of preventive benefits in employee health plans.

It was the first major challenge to ObamaCare to come before the court since the justices upheld the law’s individual requirement to buy health insurance two years ago.

Dozens of companies, including Hobby Lobby, claim religious objections to covering some or all contraceptives. The methods and devices at issue before the Supreme Court are those the plaintiffs say can work after conception. They are the emergency contraceptives Plan B and ella, as well as intrauterine devices, which can cost up to $1,000.

The court had never before recognized a for-profit corporation’s religious rights under federal law or the Constitution. The companies in this case, and their backers, argue that a 1993 federal law on religious freedom extends to businesses.

The Obama administration argued it’s not just about birth control, and that a Supreme Court ruling in favor of the businesses could undermine laws governing immunizations, Social Security taxes and minimum wages.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Why Did The Chicken Cross The Road?

image

SARAH PALIN: The chicken crossed the road because, gosh-darn it, he’s a maverick!

BARACK OBAMA: Let me be perfectly clear, if the chickens like their eggs they can keep their eggs. No chicken will be required to cross the road to surrender her eggs. Period.

JOHN McCAIN: My friends, the chicken crossed the road because he recognized the need to engage in cooperation and dialogue with all the chickens on the other side of the road.

HILLARY CLINTON: What difference at this point does it make why the chicken crossed the road.

GEORGE W. BUSH: We don’t really care why the chicken crossed the road. We just want to know if the chicken is on our side of the road or not. The chicken is either with us or against us. There is no middle ground here.

DICK CHENEY: Where’s my gun?

BILL CLINTON: I did not cross the road with that chicken.

AL GORE: I invented the chicken.

JOHN KERRY: Although I voted to let the chicken cross the road, I am now against it! It was the wrong road to cross, and I was misled about the chicken’s intentions. I am not for it now, and will remain against it.

AL SHARPTON: Why are all the chickens white?

Continue reading

Report: Canada Pulls Plug on Keystone Pipeline – Will Send Oil to Asia

Only a Democrat could make such a dangerous and irresponsible decision for the country.

The Keystone Pipeline project was expected to create tens of thousands of high paying jobs in the oil industry. The project itself would create 20,000 construction jobs. And the pipeline would bring oil from Canada and North Dakota to refineries in the United States.

image

Only a Democrat could make such a dangerous and irresponsible decision for the country.

The proposed project would have extended from Alberta, Canada to Illinois, transporting approximately 400,000 barrels of crude oil per day. Estimated cost is $1.7 billion.

But Obama rejected the plan in 2011 and 2014.

Democrats are beholden to the radical green movement – the poor and middle class be damned.

Now this…
Canada pulled the plug on Keystone and will send the oil to Asia.
Watts Up With That reported:

Obama’s inability to make a decision on Keystone has finally yielded a result – Canada has made the decision for him.

Breitbart reports Canada has just approved the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project – a major pipeline to ship Canadian oil to Asia.

The Canadian oil will still be burnt – in Asia, instead of America.

All the jobs and energy security which Canadian oil could have delivered to America, will instead be delivered to Asia.

Rather than purchasing crude from a friendly and allied neighbor, the United States will most likely need to continue its reliance upon hostile sources like Venezuela.

SOURCE: The Gateway Pundit