Illegal Alien Charged With Beheading 13 Year Old Special Needs Girl, Killing Her Grandmother

Connected to drug cartels. What pleasant people. This “scumbag” doesn’t need to be deported he needs to be put to DEATH 💀 ASAP!!…….Papa Mike

Via Daily Wire:

Alabama law enforcement officials say that an illegal immigrant and an immigrant in the United States on a green card are responsible for the brutal murders of a grandmother and her 13-year-old special needs granddaughter in what investigators say is violence related to Mexican drug cartels.

AL.com reports:

A 13-year-old Huntsville girl was beheaded after she witnessed her grandmother assaulted with a knife and left to die on the ground in a cemetery, court testimony revealed.

The grandmother, 49-year-old Oralia Mendoza, was allegedly connected to the Sinaloa Mexican drug cartel which is widely considered to be the largest and most powerful drug trafficking organization in the world.

Keep reading…

SOURCE: WEASEL ZIPPERS 

Brett Kavanaugh Fought The Clinton/Castro Kidnapping Of Elian Gonzalez Back To Stalinist Cuba

Explains the attack by Hillary Clinton.

Via Townhall:

If we needed more proof (atop the media panic) that President Trump nominated the right SCOTUS candidate here it is:

“Kavanaugh represented, on a pro bono basis, six-year-old Elian Gonzalez after the Immigration and Naturalization Service decided to return him to Cuba. Kavanaugh was among a series of lawyers who sought legal injunctions to stop INS…from sending the boy back to Cuba…”

Whoops! I already hear the caterwauling about “separating immigrant children from their parents!” So let’s clear that up first:

The genuine issue during the Elian Gonzalez circus had NOTHING to do with “parental rights,” as the Castro/Fake News Media/ Democrat propaganda campaign claimed (and many half-wits swallowed.) Instead it was: should a mass-murdering, terror-sponsoring foreign dictator trample on the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights with the compliance of a U.S. president.

Well, a Clinton was in the White House. So naturally, despite the best efforts of people like Brett Kavanaugh, the communist dictator whose lifelong dream was to nuke the U.S., whose own “courts” channeled Stalin’s during the Great Terror, and whose sidekick Che Guevara boasted that “judicial procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail” –the whims of this mass-murdering international terrorist and criminal easily prevailed over the U.S. Constitution.

After all, even lifelong liberal Democrats like Alan Dershowitz and Harvard‘s Lawrence Tribe gagged at the unconstitutionality of Elian’s kidnapping by the INS (on Fidel Castro’s orders as obeyed by Bill Clinton and transmitted to Eric Holder, Janet Reno and ultimately the INS.)

“They (the Clinton administration) acted lawlessly. They should have gotten a court order. They didn`t go for a court order because they knew they couldn`t get one. It`s a dangerous day for all Americans. (Alan Dershowitz, April 25, 2000.)

In fact, this key item was frantically hushed by the Fake News Media/Democrat cabal, but Elian’s father was initially delighted that his motherless son was in the U.S. and in the loving arms of his uncles and cousins.

Mauricio Vicent, a reporter for Madrid newspaper El Pais, wrote that a week after Elian’s rescue at sea, he’d visited Elian’s hometown of Cardenas in Cuba and talked with Elian’s father, Juan Miguel, along with other family members and friends. All confirmed that Juan Miguel had always longed for his son Elian to flee to the United States. Shortly after Elian’s rescue, his father had even applied for a U.S. visa!

Then Fidel Castro stepped into the picture. “I always said I would turn over Elian to his father,” explained Elian’s Miami uncle Lazaro, “if Juan Miguel would come here freely and claim him. But I knew he could never do that. I knew it wasn’t Juan Miguel requesting Elian–it was Fidel.”

Keep reading…

Democrat Fight: Manchin Says Schumer Can ‘Kiss My You Know What’ On Kavanaugh Nomination

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has stated that he intends to do everything possible to block President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh from being confirmed to the nation’s highest court, but he has one major problem standing in his way: moderate Democrats.

“Kavanaugh’s nomination is already a huge headache for the Senate minority leader. Not only is he under pressure from the left to tank the nominee, Schumer also has a half-dozen vulnerable members from red and purple states up for reelection this fall,” Politico reported. “To defeat Kavanaugh, Schumer has to keep all 49 of his members in tow and convince at least one moderate Republican to break ranks.”

“I’ll be 71 years old in August, you’re going to whip me? Kiss my you knouw what,” Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) said when asked if Schumer has power to influence how he chooses to vote in the confirmation, according to Politico.

The Democrats are facing a potential disaster this fall during the 2018 midterms as a recent poll suggested that Republicans could, in a best-case scenario, pick up nine seats in the Senate.

Vulnerable Democrat Senators facing re-election this fall include Sens. Joe Manchin (WV), Heidi Heitkamp (ND), Joe Donnelly (IN), Claire McCaskill (MO), Jon Tester (MT), Bill Nelson (FL), Bill Casey (PA), Sherrod Brown (OH), and Tim Kaine (VA).

Those Democrats will be stuck between a rock and a hard place this fall, being forced to choose risking losing reelection based on how they vote during the confirmation or being ostracized by their own party if they do not cave to Schumer.​

SOURCE: Daily Wire

JIMMY KIMMEL WADED INTO POLITICS AND ONCE AGAIN MISLED HIS VIEWERS ALONG THE WAY

Late night host Jimmy Kimmel on Thursday deleted a video clip from Twitter and YouTube that falsely informed viewers that a proposed Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rule would force them to pay hundreds of dollars to complain to the FCC.

“The FCC is considering a plan that would require U.S. citizens to pay $225 to make a complaint. So, if you’re mad about how high your cable bill is, soon you can pay the government $225 to complain about it,” the host of ABC’s “Jimmy Kimmel Live” told his viewers Wednesday night.

“Boy they really have the fingers on the pulse of us, don’t they? It’s shameless, really. Time and time again this administration, they side with the big corporations over people,” the comedian riffed. He then acted out a skit in which a coffee shop customer had to pay $225 to complain about a barista spitting in his drink.

But Kimmel appears to have botched the facts. (RELATED: Jimmy Kimmel: Conservatives Are Too Dumb To Be Talk Show Hosts)

Americans aren’t charged to file informal complaints through the FCC Consumer Complaint Center, a fact that won’t change under any rule being considered by the FCC.

SOURCE: DAILY CALLER

Continue reading “JIMMY KIMMEL WADED INTO POLITICS AND ONCE AGAIN MISLED HIS VIEWERS ALONG THE WAY”

Strzok Claims He Still Has Top Secret Security Clearance Despite Sessions Saying He Doesn’t

SO WHAT ROCK IS OUR ATTORNEY GENERAL HIDING UNDER. NO ONE HAS HERD OR SEEN HIM IN MONTHS! THAT LITTLE WEASEL SHOULD BE FIRED ASAP AND TREY GOWDY SHOULD BE SWORN IN…..THAT MAN WILL CLEAN UP EVERY SWAMP FROM COAST TO COAST!!……..Papa Mike

So who’s lying here and why does he still have it, if that’s true?

Via Daily Caller:

Anti-Trump FBI agent Peter Strzok told Congress on Thursday that he still has a top secret security clearance, in contradiction with a claim made in June by Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

“You currently have what classification?” Strzok was asked by Georgia Republican Rep. Doug Collins during a joint hearing of the House Judiciary and House Oversight Committees.

“I have a top secret clearance with some SCI compartments,” replied Strzok, the former deputy director of the FBI’s counterintelligence division. “SCI” is an acronym for highly classified materials known as Sensitive Compartmented Information. (RELATED: Sessions Claims That Peter Strzok Lost Security Clearance)

Strzok’s statement is a surprise of sorts given comments that Sessions made during a June 21 interview with conservative radio host Howie Carr.

Keep reading..

SOURCE: Weasel Zippers 

STRZOK REFUSES TO ANSWER KEY TRUMP DOSSIER QUESTIONS

 

FBI special agent Peter Strzok refused to answer House Freedom Caucus co-founder Jim Jordan regarding which individuals gave the Bureau three copies of the Trump dossier, claiming the FBI will not allow him to divulge his sources.

Strzok appeared before a joint House committee hearing Thursday to discuss his role in the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

After Jordan got Strzok on record admitting to having read the dossier, the Ohio representative zoned in on an email Strzok sent to a number of intelligence officials, including a woman he was having an extramarital affair with, former FBI counsel Lisa Page. In the email, Strzok discussed the different version of the dossier the FBI received from three separate sources.

“We got an e-mail that you sent. It should be presented there or should be in front of you there. I want you to take a look at this. This is an e-mail you wrote to Lisa Page, Bill, Jim, and cc’d Andy McCabe. The subject is Buzzfeed is about to accomplish the dossier. Are you familiar with this e-mail?” Jordan asked.

“I am,” Strzok replied.

“It says this, ‘Comparing now the set is only identical to what McCain had, parentheses, it has differences from what was given to us by Corn and Simpson.’ Did you write all that?” Jordan asked.

Strzok tried to get around the question, but Jordan persisted. (RELATED: Swalwell Calls For Bannon Subpoena)

“It says ‘Peter Strzok’ and it says to ‘Lisa Page’ and a whole bunch of key people to the FBI. Did you write it?” Jordan asked.

“I did write this,” Strzok replied.

Jordan then tried to figure out who the Corn and Simpson Strzok was referencing and what their relation was to the dossier dumps. Strzok said that he is unable to answer that question under FBI direction.

Increasingly frustrated, Jordan then tried to coax Strzok to reveal the identities of Corn, Simpson and another source, Page.

“I just want to figure this out. I want to figure this out, agent Strzok. You’re referencing three copies of the dossier: the Buzzfeed copy you have, the one john McCain’s staff gave to you and the one that you said you got from Corn and Simpson. The one McCain gave to you and the one Buzzfeed has are identical in your words, but they have — the Corn and Simpson one is different,” Jordan said.

SOURCE: THE DAILY CALLER

Continue reading “STRZOK REFUSES TO ANSWER KEY TRUMP DOSSIER QUESTIONS”

BREAKING REPORT: Top Hillary Aide Huma Abedin Gave “FALSE” Statements to FBI Agents in 2017 Interview

PICTURE BELOW WAS POSTED BY Papa Mike AND NOT FROM THE SOURCE OF THIS ARTICLE 

WHERE IS THE JUSTICE?

Huma Abedin gave false statements to FBI agents in 2016 AND 2017, YET SHE NEVER WAS CHARGED!

The FBI previously declassified Huma’s 302 summary from her 2016 interview with Peter Strzok and David Laufman.

Hillary’s ride-or-die aides, Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills both lied to Strzok and Laufman.

Abedin lied to Strzok in her 2016 interview when said she had no knowledge of Hillary Clinton’s private server until after leaving the State Department in early 2013.

Abedin did not know that Clinton had a private server until about a year and a half ago when it became public knowledge,” according to Strzok’s 302 summary interview with Huma.

Email exchanges between Huma Abedin and other Clinton aides in 2010 and 2011, however, reveal she was fully aware of Hillary’s private server before it became public knowledge.

Email exchanges between Huma and other Clinton aides as previously reported by The Daily Caller:

“hrc email coming back — is server okay?” Mills asked in a Feb. 27, 2010 email to Abedin and Justin Cooper, a longtime aide to Bill Clinton who helped set up the Clinton server.

“Ur funny. We are on the same server,” Cooper replied.

Mills and Abedin were also involved in an Aug. 30, 2011 exchange in which State Department official Stephen Mull mentioned that Clinton’s “email server is down.”

And in a Jan. 9, 2011 email exchange, Cooper told Abedin that Clinton’s server had been malfunctioning because “someone was trying to hack us.”

“Had to shut down the server,” wrote Cooper, who told the FBI in his interviews that he discussed Clinton’s server with Abedin in 2009, when it was being set up.

Huma Abedin reportedly also lied to investigators in her late 2017 interview and a declassification of her 2017 302’s would make that clear, says investigative reporter, Paul Sperry.

Sperry reported: The FBI declassified Huma’s 302 from 2016. Congress must demand similar declassification of her 302 from 2017. I’m told it makes clear she gave false statements to investigators. Yet in a glaring double standard, Huma was never charged or prosecuted for 1001 — unlike Trump aide

According to the Washington Post, the FBI interviewed Huma Abedin in the winter of 2017 after they closed the Hillary email case for the second time.

The FBI interviewed Abedin a month and a half after they closed the Clinton email case.

FBI agents wanted to know how and why Hillary Clinton’s classified emails ended up on her pervert husband Anthony Weiner’s laptop.

Huma Abedin previously insisted to FBI agents she didn’t know how Hillary’s emails ended up on her husband’s laptop. Some emails were forwarded to Weiner and others were saved on his laptop because of an automated backup process.

 

Trump’s former National Security Advisor Mike Flynn was charged, and is awaiting sentencing after making a false statement (supposedly) to the FBI, yet Huma Abedin roams free.

In fact, Senate investigators now believe Andrew McCabe altered Flynn’s 302’s after Strzok’s ambush-style interview.

Where is the justice??

IT BEGINS=> GOP Lawmaker: ‘If it Requires Handcuffs to Get Lisa Page to Abide by A Congressional Subpoena, So Be It’

Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY)

HERE WE GO…

On Wednesday, Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY) said if it takes putting Lisa Page in handcuffs and bringing her to Capitol Hill by force in order to get her to comply with a Congressional subpoena, so be it. 

On Wednesday, House Speaker Paul Ryan told reporters he’s willing to hold Lisa Page in contempt of Congress if she continues to defy a Congressional subpoena.

On Tuesday night Trump-hating FBI lawyer Lisa Page and her legal counsel announced she will not appear before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday despite a Congressional subpoena.

A defiant Lisa Page argued through her lawyer she wasn’t given enough time to prepare for the interview and was not allowed to review requested documents at the FBI on Tuesday.

On Wednesday, House Speaker Paul Ryan told reporters he’s willing to hold Lisa Page in contempt of Congress if she continues to defy a Congressional subpoena.

In A Very, Very Unusual Request, Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein Asks Federal Prosecutors to Help With Kavanaugh Paperwork …WTH

 

FIRST OF ALL WHERE THE HELL IS ATTORNEY GENERAL SESSIONS? WHY IS A DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL MAKING THESE KIND OF DECISIONS WITHOUT HIS KNOWLEDGE . ROSENSTEIN SHOULD BE FIRED ASAP! 

How the hell is Brett Kavanaugh a United States Court of Appeals Judge not already fully vetted. This sounds like a deep state set up by Rod Rosenstein.

In an unusual request, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein asked federal prosecutors to help review documents of President Trump’s SCOTUS nominee, Brett Kavanaugh.

Rosenstein’s email subject line sent to 93 US Attorney’d read, “Personal Message to U.S. Attorneys From the Deputy A.G.,” and included the sentence, “We need your help in connection with President Trump’s nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to serve on the Supreme Court.”

The New York Times reported:

Rod J. Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, has asked federal prosecutors to help review the government documents of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, according to a letter obtained by The New York Times on Wednesday.

Mr. Rosenstein’s request was an unusual insertion of politics into federal law enforcement. While the Justice Department has helped work on previous Supreme Court nominations, department lawyers in Washington typically carry out that task, not prosecutors who pursue criminal investigations nationwide.

But in an email sent this week to the nation’s 93 United States attorneys, Mr. Rosenstein asked each office to provide up to three federal prosecutors “who can make this important project a priority for the next several weeks.” Names were to be submitted to Mr. Rosenstein’s office by the end of Wednesday.

Mr. Rosenstein’s email, which had the subject line “Personal Message to U.S. Attorneys From the Deputy A.G.,” included the sentence, “We need your help in connection with President Trump’s nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to serve on the Supreme Court.”

According to Christopher Hunter, a former FBI agent and federal prosecutor, “It’s flat-out wrong to have career federal prosecutors engaged in a political process like the vetting of a Supreme Court nominee. It takes them away from the mission they’re supposed to be fulfilling, which is effective criminal justice enforcement,” The New York Times reported.

Rosenstein said in his email to the Department that he expects to have the equivalent of 100 full-time lawyers to work on Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation.

Although federal prosecutors have been used in the past to help with judicial confirmations, this is the first time a Deputy Attorney General has sent out such a broad request to United States attorneys offices, says the New York Times.

On Monday, President Trump announced Judge Brett Kavanaugh as his second pick for the Supreme Court of the United States.

Judge Kavanaugh will replace Justice Kennedy on the Supreme Court.

Rosenstein knows President Trump can take Mueller all the way up to the Supreme Court so it appears he is doing everything he can to delay the confirmation to prevent Trump from cementing a conservative majority which could ultimately put an end to the Russia witch hunt.
Overall it is unnecessary for Rosenstein to vet Judge Kavanaugh at all because he should have already been vetted in order to hold his current position –
SOURCE: The Gateway Pundit 

Lawsuit To Remove Measure To Divide California Into Three States From Ballot

  • Democrats want to keep the plantation of dependency intact.

Via Washington Times:

Opponents of an initiative to split California into three states asked the state Supreme Court to pull the measure from the ballot, arguing it’s too drastic a change to state government to go through the normal initiative process.

A lawsuit filed Monday by the Planning and Conservation League argues major changes to the state’s government structure require approval from two-thirds of the Legislature before going under consideration by voters or a state constitutional convention.

The initiative would break the state into Northern California, California and Southern California.

Northern California would comprise the Bay Area, Silicon Valley, Sacramento and counties north of the current state capital. California would be a strip of land along the coast stretching from Los Angeles to Monterey. Southern California would include Fresno and the surrounding farming communities, reaching all the way to San Diego and the Mexican border.

Venture capitalist Tim Draper is financing the “Cal 3” initiative in his latest attempt to divide the state. He has spent more than $1.7 million supporting it. The nation’s most populous state has become too difficult to govern because of its size, wealth disparities and geographic diversity, Draper and the initiative’s supporters argue.

Draper did not comment on the lawsuit because he had not seen it. A spokeswoman for the initiative also did not comment.

The California Supreme Court has tossed initiatives in the past after ruling they went too far in changing government structure.

Keep reading…

Hillary Clinton Was Not Super Pleased People Told Her to Shut Up And Go Away After The Election

Hillary Clinton spoke at an event at Rutgers University in New Jersey on Thursday night, addressing the reaction—hers and the public’s—to her loss in the 2016 election. And when she was asked how she’d respond to critics who told her to “get off the public stage and shut up,” per the moderator’s wording, she seemed less than pleased.

“I was really struck by how people said that to me — you know, mostly people in the press, for whatever reason — mostly, ‘Go away, go away,’” Clinton told Ruth Mandel, the director of the Eagleton Institute of Politics at Rutgers, perThe Hill. She added, “And I had one of the young people who works for me go back and do a bit of research. They never said that to any man who was not elected. I was kind of struck by that.”

Indeed, as Clinton (who was paid $25,000 out of the university’s endowment for her appearance) noted, fellow losing candidates like John Kerry, John McCain, Al Gore and Mitt Romney went on to have illustrious careers after their campaigns fell short. In some cases (i.e. Romney’s) it might have been better had they in fact disappeared into the ether immediately following their concession speeches, but her point stands.

“I’m really glad that, you know, Al Gore didn’t stop talking about climate change,” Clinton said. “And I’m really glad John Kerry went to the Senate and became an excellent secretary of State. And I’m really glad John McCain kept speaking out and standing up and saying what he had to say. And for heavens sakes, Mitt Romney is running for the Senate.”

Clinton has been criticized for failing to “move on” following her defeat, having repeatedly brought up the people and factors she believes contributed to it—James Comey, Bernie Sanders, Barack Obama, the media, sexism, and Vladimir Putin, to name a few—and whether or not her assessment is correct, it isn’t necessarily helpful at this very moment.

The Democrats are making an attempt to gain ground in 2018, an effort that likely won’t be bolstered by a schism between the Clinton and Sanders camps, and a refusal on the former’s part to acknowledge where criticism of her campaign and policies were warranted. So does it behoove a failed candidate to step aside and let the party figure out where it stands? Probably. Are we all very tired of hearing about how the 2016 election went wrong? Definitely.

Then again, if my life’s dream was to be President of the United States, and I managed, after decades of trying, to become the first woman presidential candidate, and I was sure I was going to win, and everybody else told me I was going to win, and then the country voted for this idiot and told me to shut up and stay in the woods, I don’t know, I’d probably be mad.

%d bloggers like this: